Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0362820100290020001
Journal of the Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry
2010 Volume.29 No. 2 p.1 ~ p.12
A retrospective study of the peri-implant bone changes in immediate installation implants with different causes for loss of teeth
Cha Jeong-Seop

Min Kyung-Gi
Jeon Sang-Ho
Kwon Jong-Jin
Abstract
Purpose: The present study analyzed the peri-implant bone level changes and survival rate of implants in patients with different causes for loss of teeth treated with immediate installation of implants. Also the peri-implant bone level changes within each group according to maxilla and mandible, segments, length, prosthesis span and prosthesis type existing in opposing tooth were compared.

Materials and Methods: Straumann Regular implants were used in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups; Group A consisted of patients with tooth loss due to periodontal disease and Group C showed loss of tooth due to dental caries or endodontic complications who received immediately loaded implant, and subjects in Group B presented with tooth loss due to periodontal disease who received conventionally loaded implant. Temporary prostheses were delivered after abutments were set on the day of implant installation for immediately loaded implant protocol. On the other hand, conventionally loaded implant protocol proceeded with second surgery after cover screw was set. Prosthodontic procedures were done after 3 months later for mandible and 6 months later for maxilla in both protocols.

Results: Fifty five (thirty eight males and seventeen females), twenty (`sixteen males and four females) and thirty eight (twenty five males and thirteen females) patients were included in respective to groups A, B, and C. For groups A, B, and C, 193, 56 and 86 implants were used, of which 3, 0 and 2 implants were failed. Therefore, the survival rates for groups A, B, and C were 98.4, 100 and 97.7% respectively. The peri-implant bone level changes in groups B and C in comparison to group A were not significantly different. The peri-implant bone level changes within each group according to maxilla and mandible, segments, length, prosthesis span and prosthesis type existing in opposing tooth showed no statistical difference.

Conclusions: The implants treated with immediate loading and immediate installation had satisfactory survival rate which implied that periodontally compromised are not contraindication for this protocol.
KEYWORD
dental caries, immediate installation, immediate loading, peri-implant bone level change, periodontal disease, survival rate
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information